{ 24 comments }

Pablo Baqués November 9, 2009 at 9:22 AM

Thanks, this is helpful. I am not sure where an instructor fits in, but for now I will self classify as “professional speaker”.

thanks again.

Pablo Baqués
The Necklaces Vival

Jonathan November 10, 2009 at 2:20 AM

Very nice, but…

I would like to know more about the differences in the account types?

It’s obvious that the University account type is for universities :-) but how is it different form the other accounts?

Patrick Richard November 10, 2009 at 8:02 AM

Je comprends que cette initiative peut avoir une utilité sur un plan statistique pour mieux connaître vos utilisateurs.
Cependant, il manque au moins une catégorie afin de classer ceux d’entre nous pour qui réaliser des “Powerpoint Shows” est un hobby.
En attendant, je me suis inscrit dans “Presentation Design Firm”, ce qui n’est pas le cas.
Bien cordialement.
Patrick

srini November 14, 2009 at 1:20 AM

Welcome segmentation.

There is a whole host of entertainers who display their technical wizardry or artistic skills there their slide shows.
They may not be doing this as a commercial proposition (and so can’t be classify themselves as business nor as design firms. Probably you need to add another account type for such members.

It may help to add icons to quickly identify the account types.

Tom Layton November 16, 2009 at 1:40 PM

How about “Consultant” or “Independent Consultant” or “Freelance Consultant”

John Beam November 17, 2009 at 9:08 AM

As a not-for-profit ministry I feel that Non-Profit and government combined does not work because of separation of Church and state.

Phil Reagan November 17, 2009 at 11:55 AM

To cover training developers and trainers I would change “Presentation Design Firm” to “Presentation and Training Consultants”

Bryan McDonald November 17, 2009 at 8:08 PM

I’d like to see an account type for K-12 Classes/Teacher/Educator.

Dorian Glass November 17, 2009 at 9:42 PM

Hi there,

As a classic business consultancy (and there must be many more like me) I don’t see a descriptor for “business consultancies”/ “consultancies”/”professional services”/etc.
It’s clear that this would be a key requirement to include in your new catagorisations.
Kind rgds,
Dorian

amit November 17, 2009 at 10:17 PM

Hi,

As time progresses, in case we feel the need, we may add other types of accounts. At this stage the new types of accounts, along with the “Industry/cause” indicator should take care of all cases. And remember, we can’t possibly have a very long list.

Dorian & Tom… consultancies/services etc should logically come under “company”

Bryan… we have a University/School account, also you can choose the default account with “education” as the industry/cause

Phil… thanks for the suggestion…we’ll consider your idea

Charles… WE HAVE Apple keynote compatability for over a year now… just upload… seems you have missed this

Srini… for entertainment, you could have a default account with a appropriate industry/cause indicator (which is optional for default)… I dont think this qualifies for a separate account type. Entertainment is probably a content type, rather than an account type. For content type, we already have categories, tags etc

Jonathan… stay tuned. This is the first step in the accpunt bifurcation. The differences will roll out slowly.

Bob Skattum November 18, 2009 at 5:06 AM

How about individual or consultant.

Martin Haworth November 19, 2009 at 2:06 AM

What about small and medium business owner or even single person business owner?

Martin Haworth

Martin Haworth November 19, 2009 at 2:08 AM

Actually, I now see that I should have supported Dorian and Tom, this is a discrete business segment and I would think quite a significant user of your services.

Regards

Martin

Geoff Clegg November 19, 2009 at 6:12 AM

As previously mentioned , how about consultants, my company is a health and safety consultancy.

Thanks,

Geoff

PG Bhat November 19, 2009 at 7:09 AM

I as an individual teach in various schools as a social cause. I do not understand to which category I would fall.

gpw November 19, 2009 at 7:30 AM

Consider the merits of further segmenting NPO: religious organization, (online) publisher or advocate – I’m thinking of the outreach or public engagement function of an organization (university outreach or extension services; corporate relations or campaigns of eduction/infotainment).

enfeda November 19, 2009 at 8:59 AM

Hi guys, I am disapointed. I can not join any group. I miss my profile as I am a freelance professional, that uses Powerpoint occasionally, for my own productivity and to highlight my personal brand.

I hope the “default” is not penalized with respect to the provided services and the free features taht are (or will be) available.

Thank you for caring about “freelancers”.
Enfeda

Webmasters Opstandingskerk November 19, 2009 at 12:00 PM

Hello,
We are a church. I guess we use the non-profit-account.
But what should we choose by Industrie/Cause?

David Zatz November 19, 2009 at 8:33 PM

I agree with Tom who said “How about “Consultant” or “Independent Consultant” or “Freelance Consultant””. That’s how I would qualify myself, and this is probably the fastest growing category considering the shifts taking place throughout the economy.

Achal Raghavan November 19, 2009 at 11:52 PM

Suggest add “Consultant”.

Stephanie L. Gross November 20, 2009 at 7:17 AM

There should also be room for at least 3 URLs, including professional, blog, and homepage. I have a homepage, an organization, and that organization has a blog of which I’m the editor. Thanks.

Sanmaya kumar Dhal December 30, 2009 at 12:04 AM

Thanks.

I was thinking for this feature since the very beginning of my slidesharing.

I would tell this to all my clients and partners. Thanks

Bluraymac February 1, 2010 at 7:55 PM

It’s very helpful, and I have to do the presentations in 2 days, here I found the solution. Thanks

converter March 22, 2011 at 10:51 PM

That is some inspirational stuff.never knew that opinions could be this varied.Thanks for all the enthusiasm to offer such helpful information here!

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 2 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: